Executives · Compliance

Compliance as a saved query. Not a six-week project.

Audit at the framework boundary, encryption at the persistence layer, three-tier access at the runtime — the regulator's checklist already lives inside the platform.

Request a demo Read the docs

KVKK / GDPR / BDDK compliance — For executives use case overview from Apinizer. — For executives · KVKK / GDPR / BDDK compliance

The problem

Compliance teams shouldn't be the last to find out a system isn't auditable.

Most platforms treat audit, encryption, and access as opt-in middleware. Compliance teams discover the gap in October, with November to fix it. Apinizer treats those controls as constitutional: they're enforced at the framework boundary, not by convention. The evidence packet auditors ask for ships out of the platform as a query, not a project.

Capabilities

What Apinizer does here

Audit at the persistence layer

Every change — config, secret, grant, deploy, view — captured immutably. Bypass is rejected at the framework, not by code review.

Encrypted secret fields

Tokens, keys, and credentials encrypted before persistence; decrypted only at runtime. They never appear in lists, exports, or backups.

Three-tier access

Platform, Project, Environment scopes federated to your AD / LDAP / OIDC. Segregation of duties enforced by the runtime, not by memo.

Article 30 / record-of-processing

Personal-data flows joined to consent, retention, and access logs. GDPR Article 30 / KVKK envanteri queries return in seconds.

Sector-aligned controls

BDDK, PSD2, SAMA, ACPR, AYM — every regulator's emphasis maps to a control already in the platform. We share the mapping packet.

Continuous evidence

Quarterly evidence packs generated automatically. Auditor requests close the same business day instead of the same quarter.

Use cases

In production, this looks like…

Banking
Istanbul Tier-1 bank passes BDDK quarterly audit with a saved query
What used to be a three-week reconciliation project becomes a query and an export. Auditors stop asking, 'who has access to X'.
3 weeks → 1 day
Insurance
Frankfurt insurer answers a GDPR Article 30 request in one afternoon
Article 30 record of processing joins personal-data flows to consent, retention, and access logs. The DPO ships a packet by 17:00.
Banking
Riyadh bank meets SAMA Cyber Security Framework controls 4.2 + 4.3
Audit, encryption, and segregation-of-duties mapped to SAMA paragraphs in the evidence packet. The regulator's review closes early.
Healthcare
Lyon hospital network ships HDS (Hébergement de Données de Santé) evidence
Every PHI access logged; every retention window enforced. The HDS auditor signs off after one visit instead of three.
Government
Rome ministry maps AgID-CAD controls to platform telemetry
CAD (Codice dell'Amministrazione Digitale) controls map one-to-one to platform features. Audit posture documented in one page.
Telecom
Madrid carrier satisfies ENS (Esquema Nacional de Seguridad) high-level requirements
Audit retention, segregation of duties, and encryption-at-rest mapped. The ENS audit closes with no findings.
Energy
Prague utility maps NIS2 essential-entity controls
Incident reporting, supply-chain audit, and access controls — all already covered by Apinizer's existing model.
Banking
Caspian-region bank meets AYM standards with the same controls used for KVKK
Local AYM controls overlap heavily with KVKK. One platform, two regulators, one evidence pack.